Student Problem Solving: How do we combat transphobia within our community?
The UTS Gender Equity Committee has been busy putting together a workshop for the grade 9 students to teach them about privilege and equity, specifically focusing on transphobia and sexism. The GEC has observed that while some students and teachers are very inclusive when it comes to gender identity, some are not, and the students in the club have observed particular problems with students making transphobic jokes. Statements such as, “but it’s just a joke–I’m not trying to offend anyone”, are reported to often be the responses of students making these jokes when they get called out.
The GEC decided that the most effective way to combat this transphobia is to educate. I am really impressed by the way they have tackled this issue: by first identifying a specific issue, and secondly, by assessing the most appropriate way to address it.
Plans are now underway for the workshop for the M3 (grade 9) students, and it will take place in April or May. In the midst of discussing the workshop for the M3 students, it hit me that while I completely agreed this population of the school was in need of education, I could think of another group in need: our own cohort. While I believe 100% we are all well-intended, informed, inclusive individuals, we all have something more to learn, and I think we could really benefit from a student-led workshop on transphobia and gender equity, whereby students are speaking about issues from their perspective. I proposed the idea that they could tweak the workshop for the M3s for our 143 cohort and they were really excited about the idea. A question for you, colleagues who are reading this blog, is whether you think this idea would be beneficial?
Student Leadership: Planning the GEC Workshop
It was really interesting to observe and support the students in the planning of their workshop. They are going to first focus on the M3 workshop, and then move on to the TC 143 workshop (if it gets approved from our profs). The chair of the group has done an excellent job of staying organized and facilitating planning sessions during the meetings. In my previous job at Lakefield College School, where I was one of the staff facilitators for their Safe Space club, I would find without staff encouragement, the students would be fine to spend most (or all) of the Safe Space meeting time casually talking about their own gossip; it started to feel like a space for a group of friends to hang out. At UTS, however, the students are productive and on-task during their meetings, and I am constantly impressed with their mature, nuanced opinions on the issues they are tackling.
The Privilege Walk & Socially Responsible Citizens
An example of this student leadership was the January 31 meeting about doing a privilege walk to start off the M3 workshop. For those that don’t know what a privilege walk is, watch this quick YouTube video of an example of one. I promise you it’s powerful (and informative): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hD5f8GuNuGQ. The students explained how they did a privilege walk in their F2 (grade 8) geography class, and everyone was familiar with the concept. That alone was impressive, because it demonstrates that students are aware of the concept of privilege. People my age are not always aware of this, so it demonstrates the progressive nature of the younger generation. The students found a series of questions that were used for a privilege walk at UBC and edited them together. The level of maturity was astounding, and I was blown away by how they would discuss each question with nuance and awareness. They edited the statements to make sure it applied to UTS students, and some of the statements are as follows:
• Take one step forward if you can show affection to your romantic partner in public without fearing ridicule or violence
• Take one step forward if your ancestors’ history was taught accurately to you in schools
• Take one step forward if using gendered bathrooms has been stress-free for you
• Take one step forward if you see your gender on forms, licence applications etc.
• Take one step backwards if you ever felt offended by a joke or remark about the people you identify with, but felt unsafe to confront the situation.
I am really proud of the work the GEC has done on the workshop thus far, and I think this workshop exemplifies the way the students are promoting being socially responsible citizens. By educating the M3s about privilege, the GEC is taking a step towards creating an environment where it is safe to be trans, safe to be gender queer, safe to be a woman, safe to be a person of colour, safe to be a queer person of colour etc. They are encouraging the M3s to consider their own privilege, and perhaps their own complicity in making a space unsafe, thus advocating for socially responsible citizens. This workshop aligns with the Asia Society’s dimensions of global competencies: Students have been investigating how transphobia is prevalent within UTS and also more broadly in Toronto. They have been considering perspectives of transgender people (through doing research and informing themselves of the barriers that transgender people face). And they also have been reflecting together about what they have observed at UTS (see above re: jokes). They are in the process of planning the workshop for the M3 students, which will “communicate ideas effectively with diverse audiences” (Asia Society, 2011, p. 11). This workshop is also an example of “[taking] action to improve conditions, viewing themselves as players in the world and participating reflectively” (p. 11). I am really looking forward to seeing how the workshop plays out, and I think something I can do as a facilitator of student leadership is to encourage the reflection process at the conclusion of the workshop.
Sources:
Mansilla, V. B., & Jackson, A. (2011). Educating for global competence: preparing our youth to engage the world. New York, NY: Asia Society. doi:https://asiasociety.org/files/book-globalcompetence.pdf
Zoe –
Thanks for sharing this! A few years ago (2?), I invited a group of senior UTS students to facilitate a workshop with my J/I Anti-Discrimination class. The UTS students basically adapted a number of activities that they had led with Grade 7 (8?) students in their own school. Included in the activities was the Walk of Privilege and other effective equity tools. The UTS students were invited to comment throughout their session on incidents & insights that arose as they led the workshop with the Grade 7’s – and thus opened the door for lots of good talk not only about the concepts, but also about the pedagogy & facilitation tips. It was a great session!! I would think you could find space within one of your OISE classes (maybe Issues 2 in intersession?). Additional strategies can be found online at sources such as http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/edactivism/Activist_Planning_Tools/index.html
I agree & see clear evidence of how these actions align with aspects of the Asia Society document. I’m curious how you read the “equity stance” of that document itself? Encouraging multiple perspectives & taking action can still operate within a pretty safe/liberal stance. What might you imagine the UTS students in the GEC might think of the statements & priorities listed by the Asia Society? Does it promote challenge & change on the level advocated by these students? Is it ‘soft’ or ‘critical’ global citizenship? What’s your role in offering how they might be strategic in promoting more ‘radical’ (as in roots) forms of change? Is their activism limited to consciousness raising conveyed through additive activities or are they seeking to effect curricular and/or policy changes at their school?
Looking forward to seeing what sort of traction/action this club is able to mount –
D
LikeLike
Hi Zoe,
Such an inspiring workshop! It is amazing what the UTS students can accomplish! This really shows their dedication to equity within the school. I personally would appreciate a workshop on transphobia and gender equity, especially on how to incorporate these strategies into a physical education program. From my MTRP research, it has become apparent that gender inequality is a prominent barrier that prevents female students from enjoying physical education. Therefore, I am very interested in learning more on transphobia and gender equity.
I also really like your note about facilitating a reflection process after the workshop. I find that the consolidation piece is currently missing from the Wellness Team. I am curious about the types of questions that you will be asking and if you plan on facilitating a reflection piece for both the workshop attendees and the GEC? Also I am wondering what are the barriers or challenges that the GEC may face when implementing their workshop? Although the UTS student community is very well educated in worldly ideas, I am wondering if the maturity level of grade 9 students may be a potential challenge for the workshop?
Can’t wait to hear more,
Maria
LikeLike
Hi Zoe,
I really enjoyed reading your blog post! I am not surprised to hear about how smart, well-informed and mature UTS Students are, especially with such an important topic. I have to be honest, when I read “privilege walk” I was able to ‘guess’ what it may be but was not familiar with it. I loved the video you shared (thanks for that!). After watching it I realized that I may have done something similar to that effect back in middle and high school but it was on a different topic. This activity is very informative and powerful. Growing up, I wish my schools/teachers took the time to address and make use of the privilege walk. In fact, reflecting back now I don’t recall ever being nudged or probed to think about equity. Schools today are getting much better at it but we definitely still have a long way ahead. I will be having a look at your second blog to see if you address how the workshops turned out!
Thank you for your insights!
LikeLike
Hi Zoe,
Yes, we should do the workshop. I agree the people in our cohort are open-minded, welcoming, and it seems general allies of gender non-conforming individuals (or at least I can say that I know I am/would like to be as best I can!) – but I know I definitely have a lot to learn. I would say that I am in a position where I know to use a person’s preferred pronouns, and would stand up for someone who is feeling unsafe who – but I know less what to do when come across someone who is making hurtful comments about gender non-conforming or gender queer people/groups/their advocates. Which, unfortunately, happens more often than I would like. All I know to do is ask people making hurtful/insensitive comments questions that kind of get at the problems with the statement they are making (why would that be weird? why did you use that word?), because I know starting an argument isn’t the way to go necessarily, but that’s really all I have in my toolbox. So, as I said, I would really appreciate more information on how to handle these situations!
Also, love your blog so far! Looking forward to hearing more after the GEC workshops 🙂
LikeLike